Then, I felt this incredible rush of anger.
I walked away really shaken and trying to figure out why I felt such anger which felt intolerant and prejudiced. It took me a few minutes to get my feelings under control, but the sense of 'this isn't right' just wouldn't go away. I wished I'd gone up and talked to her, but as Drake put it, "Thank God your better judgement prevailed." What I felt was based on my Western perception that this garb symbolizes the oppression of women. Then I had to step back and ask, does it?
First, wearing a 'burka' is NOT a requirement in the Qur'an (Koran). Yes, this holy book does prescribe modesty for women, but apparently, the full covering stems from custom in the time of Mohamed rather than scripture. So, let's say you're a 21st century Muslim woman and you choose to wear the burka. Are you oppressed because you choose modesty in the strict Eastern interpretation? There are some women around the world who wear the burka as a symbol of their direct rejection of Western culture. Others say they wear it because they don't like being judged by their bodies.
It still seems like oppression because I'm not convinced that women in an Islamic society are exercising free choice. Are we not all brainwashed to a greater or lesser extent by our culture? The strict Islam culture believes in the subjugation of women and enforces this view by teaching women they must conform or they will bring shame on themselves and their families and ultimately damn themselves to hell. Guilt and shame are powerful emotions which can cause anyone buckets of anguish and doubt.
Clothing customs are very much a matter of culture. Throughout history, men always seems to be obsessed with how much (or how little) women wear. Islamic men do not have a corner on this. In our own country's experience, clothing was very much an instrument of control. A woman can not run, or even move very fast in 50 pounds of clothing in nine layers which was commonly accepted dress throughout most of the 19th century.
Corsets have been a standard undergarment since the 1600's. The Victorians refined it into an instrument of torture by prescribing the lacing be so tight as to obstruct breathing and cause actual physical deformity. A woman appearing in public without a corset was tantamount as a declaration of prostitution. In most places in America in the 1800's there were laws prohibiting women from wearing trousers in public. You could certainly expect to be arrested, and your husband/father would be chastised for allowing their wife/daughter to appear in pubic dressed indecently. Sound familiar?
My point is that women have been conditioned throughout history to accept cultural clothing strictures, and it is very, very recently, and only in a relatively small percentage of the world that a woman ACTUALLY has free choice. in the matter of her own clothing. There is also no 'choice' involved if a woman is considered fair game for rape or being beaten or both if she doesn't choose to wear the burka. Since the woman in Sam's doesn't run that risk from the general public, you have to accept she is choosing the burka. This is America. She can wear what she wants even if I think it's nuts.
Some Western countries are banning the burka. They cite the faux choice argument (pressured by men, religious custom, etc.), as well as something I think is much more important. Burkas cover bruises. One rationale for burka ban is that women can be more easily abused, when only their eyes and hands are visible. There are some studies that seem to indicate women who live in societies that insist on the burka have higher rates of abuse than societies that are more clothing flexible.
When I finally sorted myself out about why this woman at Sam's Club disturbed me so, I realized that it wasn't her that bothered me - it was the little girl whose hand she was holding. That little girl was dressed in typical little American girl attire. What is going to happen to her when she's thirteen? How in good conscience can her mother wear clothing that screams oppression and subjugation over a vast part of the world? Why would she set this example? All said and done - that's what really, really made me so angry. We've struggled and struggled as women to have cultural and economic equality in this country. I don't want any little girl who lives in America to be sent the message by her own mother that inferior and unequal and subjugated to men is in ANY way OK.